Study Reveals Effectiveness of Testosterone Suppression in Trans Women

I'm on a very low dose of estrogen once per week(.25ml of 20mg/ml strength estradiol valerate), and this alone does more than enough to suppress my testosterone without taking Spiro. We should be discussing why women are being starved of estrogen, rather than why they are not getting good results from a heart medication and low levels of estrogen.

Also, there is a large difference from bioidentical estrogen and progesterones, and synthetic stuff like premarin. I understand that it may be jarring that your doctor has been dosing you with substandard levels and harmful versions of estrogen/progesterone, but it's important to follow the trail. Good HRT requires better medicines, and higher estrogen levels.

i have 0.4 testosteron without blockers, so it seems it works, and with natural i mean bio identical yes, but thats not the same like androcur for example, its called a gestagene too but has almost only the total opposite effect than progesterones has. here we not get spiro, we get here all androcur, and thats what i was meaning only, that is fully chemic gestagen and has absolutely no good effects except blocking of testosterone, while progesterone has masses of good effects, like prevention of chancer, demenz, epilepsy and much more, while androcur raises the risk of all that ^^ . except that all i met in my lfie so far who got high doses of blockers, had all through the line way too low estrogen with around 50-70 thats way under normal female levels, and with that low doses, the hypothalamus not stops sending LH that the body creates self sexual hormones still, but from some probably on everyone bit different level of estrogen in body, it stops it self to some level at least, whats left is then only the normal female level of testosterone, i dont know many anymore who take blockers today, the best endo docs changed that in last years, blockers are not needed, some only even "want" it cause they want almost totally 0 of testosterone, but thats not how it is on females.

I'll also point out that starting, or observing, any scientific study with a clear bias means that you're no longer conducting a scientific study, so much as you're conducting a bias confirmation exercise.

Just a thought.

Okay,y'all arguing about this, but y'all do realize this is for oral dosing only... Right?

One of the key problems with oral dosing of any medication is how it gets digested. Assuming your body absorbs 100% of the medication, this would be a complete study. But I'd be willing to bet money that is one of the first factors they look at in followup studies.

One of the interesting things I noted from this is that having a "high" BMI showed potential correlation to low T results. And yet, a high BMI often leads doctors to reject you as a candidate for GCS. If a reliable correlation can be found here, it might open up avenues for some of us who aren't skinny.

LaraMia I don't know what ""natural"" progesterone is, estradiol and progesterone from your doctor IS biologically identical to what the body makes, I don't know how much more natural you can get than that, now your progestin (equivalent to progesterone) and Premarin (equivalent to estradiol) are both synthetic, they are similar to what the body makes, they behave similarly in the human body, both progestin and Premarin have been found to be problematic in the trans community, Premarin was the hormone used in the w.h.o. heart study that stopped due to breast cancer risk. After you consider biologically identical or synthetic the only real difference is the delivery method.

“Biologically identical hormones or bioidentical hormones are derived from plants, such as the wild yam or soybean plant. The wild yam is rich in precursor molecules that can be converted into oestrogens and other hormones whose molecular structure is the same as those produced naturally in the human body”

Not medical advice.

i take only estrogen and natural progesterone, no gestagen testo blocker or something, no androcur and no spiro, i had once only 120 estrogen then testo gone up to 6 again, so i took bit more estrogen and was at around 240 estrogen and tadaa testo is down to normal female levels :)

Beverly is right,

Why is this still a thing? Ugh, if lowering testosterone is the goal, there are numerous studies on switching out AA and using an estrogen only treatment to reduce testosterone in prostate cancer patients.

Proving that parental estrogen ALONE without AA is more effective with much less side effects.

The authors state in the abstract that "measured serum estradiol levels did not change over time and did not correlate with dosage of estradiol administered," but the estrogen serum levels were not reported in the abstract, nor the dosages and method of administration. I am sure the observations are noted the full text of the article, where I predict we would read that none of the test subjects were taking estrogen by injection.

LannahK, BeverlyCos

Testosterone or estrogen reduction, is a byproduct of supplying the body with a normal amount of testosterone or estrogen depending on ftm or mtf, once the appropriate level of hrt is reached the pituitary gland will not signal the gonads to produce their respective hormone, thus lowering the body’s level of that hormone, the pituitary gland does not distinguish between testosterone or estrogen it response to both of those hormones as if it they were the same hormone, nor does the pituitary gland care what the source of the hormones are, it simply tries to regulate them, so as long as the pituitary gland see's enough of a sex hormone it never sends the lh and fsh message to make more.

The only thing I know that can affect the suppression of testosterone or estrogen is a high levels of the Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) which will “”bind”” both testosterone and estrogen to your red blood cells, thus preventing any testosterone or estrogen from reaching their given receptors, much like spironolactone Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (with a different action) prevents your body from utilizing either testosterone or estrogen, this action also prevents the pituitary gland from suppressing the hormone production of the gonads. AKA, free or bound testosterone or estrogen.

Spironolactone does not reduce testosterone, spironolactone sits on the individual receptors of the cells that are capable of receiving testosterone, spironolactone blocks testosterone from reaching the cells with testosterone receptors, thus blocking any messaging to the cells that can respond to testosterone, spironolactone does not prevent the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone or the effects of dihydrotestosterone for that you will need finasteride or equivalent. The other and main benefit of spironolactone is that it is a diuretic which can help with any fluid retention from estrogen. In my experience there is no need or good to be had from high doses of spironolactone, only low doses.

I am not a doctor, this is my experience, my doctor, and reading. Inotherwards not medical advice.

You sure did write an article, however, you have a section starting with "Permit me to venture some personal opinions here" and includes an entire block titled "SOME ANECDOTAL EXPERIENCES". Red flags much? It's also littered with cherry-picked studies (I looked at all of them), many of which are only tangentially relevant and don't appear to support the argument. Not to mention a bunch of your references are links to other articles you have written. All you're doing is fear-mongering and trying to spread a conspiratorial, anti-establishment, message. I would caution anyone that reads Beverly's article to exercise some common sense and do your own research and talk to your endo/GP/specialist. I even encourage you to get a second opinion. This is exactly what I did and helped me to see through the nonsense. Oh, I am one of the 25% of women that Spiro doesn't work for.

Why? According to the article, 25% of women had no effect, whereas 50% had either supresson to female range or suppression to below male range "virtually all of the time". By your logic, the title "Study reveals testosterone suppression succeeds for majority of trans women" would be equally valid. It seems to me that all you're doing is trying to bias the title/article to align with your anti-spiro rhetoric. 🤔

I wrote an article here, looking at the Spironolactone problem in much greater detail. https://transhormones.wordpress.com/2018/01/01/whats-wrong-with-spironolactone/

The title should instead be, "Study reveals testosterone suppression fails for some trans women". This is good evidence of the poor practice still being followed.