by Bailey C.
There is a lot more depth and analyzing to do in this topic, but this skims the surface.
*A retraction for this article has been published on 7/7/2018.
I am American, born and raised in a small town in New York with no German background. I was not around during or right after World War II. I was not persecuted personally by Hitler’s regime for being mentally incompetent, nor was I made sterile by the Nazis. I have not had my mother be accused of being mentally unstable. I do not have a life that’s been forever changed and scarred by war and my country changing on a dime. Even so, I will become that person in a few weeks time as I shed my name and identity to pick up the one of Rudolph Petersen in a production of Judgment at Nuremberg.
“LATELY, THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE OUTCRY OF PEOPLE, TRANSGENDER, NON-BINARY AND CISGENDER ALIKE, WHO HAVE BEEN DEMANDING TRANSGENDER CHARACTERS IN MOVIES AND TV SHOWS ARE PLAYED BY TRANSGENDER ACTORS ONLY..”
I am almost 22 years old. Since age 7 or 8, I have been involved with theatre in all sorts of ways. I’ve studied all different playwrights and composers, from Shakespeare to Sondheim. I’ve admired many actors from those in small community productions to those who are taking center stage on Broadway for the millionth time. I’ve taken classes and learned about countless techniques. I am also a transgender man. Lately, there has been a huge outcry of people, transgender, non-binary and cisgender alike, who have been demanding transgender characters in movies and TV shows are played by transgender actors only; that casting cisgender actors erases the struggle of transgender people.
As someone who has spent the majority of his life in theatre, I stand with only one question when talking about the demand: Why? Isn’t the job of an actor to become the person in the script, regardless of their real life identity and experiences? I see Laverne Cox get more and more roles as her acting career expands, but I always find myself asking- so when is a major role of hers going to be a woman, with no regards to whether or not the character transgender?
“AS I DIVE FURTHER AND FURTHER INTO THE WORLD OF ACTING, I HAVE FEELINGS OF ANXIETY THAT, CONSIDERING HOW I’M OPENLY TRANSGENDER, I’LL ALWAYS GET STUCK WITH BEING A TRANSGENDER MAN IN ANY SHOW I’M IN.”
Admittedly, I don’t know Laverne personally and I cannot tell you if she prefers the expressly-transgender or gender-nonconforming characters to playing someone cisgender or someone who’s gender identity is not specified. I know there are transgender actors/actresses out there like that. I can, however, speak for myself, and other transgender actors/actresses who share my position. As I dive further and further into the world of acting, I have feelings of anxiety that, considering how I’m openly transgender, I’ll always get stuck with being a transgender man in any show I’m in. I hate that idea. I don’t want to have to be reminded of my personal struggle when I’m trying to assume the mind and life of a fictional character! That’s not acting to me. That’s just living my everyday life on a stage for a ticket price.
I feel that a lot of the people who demand transgender actors and actresses play transgender characters have clearly never spent a day in their lives as an actor of any sort. First rule of acting: you are not yourself when you’re on stage or while the camera is rolling! Sure the real life experience you have might help if the character is in a similar struggle, but the challenge (and the fun) of acting is to become someone else in entirety for the time you’re acting, whether that be for a two hour play, or all day on a movie set.
Also, let’s consider something- I might be a talented actor, but if I’m competing for a role against another actor who is more talented, has much more experience in acting and is more what the director wants in terms of appearance, I’m obviously not getting the part regardless of what it is. I’d rather see a talented cisgender actor, than a transgender actor who is mediocre.
“OUR ANGER AND SCRUTINY IS DIRECTED IN THE WRONG DIRECTIONS.”
Our anger and scrutiny is directed in the wrong directions. How so? Let’s say you’re a transgender actor or actress and you get the role of a cisgender character. Audiences get angry and rage at you- how DARE you play someone who’s cisgender! Shame! You’d be angry and upset; after all, your identity isn’t something you can help, right?
So why would you say that to a cisgender actor or actress?
I know what you’re probably saying right now- transgender people are usually stereotyped and portrayed in horrible light! It wouldn’t be the same! In some ways, no it wouldn’t be the same. However, it would be the same in terms of attacking an actor for their identity, with nothing else taken into account, just the fact that the actor is transgender.
We should ask ourselves a few questions before immediately becoming enraged at a cisgender actor playing a transgender character:
- What is the movie/play about? This year brings us (Re)Assignment, a movie about a man who is forced to undergo gender reassignment surgery as a punishment and violence by a rogue doctor. That’s not a light in which transition-related surgeries should be looked at. However, in another movie with a cisgender actor as a transgender person, The Danish Girl, it shows a trans woman’s struggle to be able to be herself in a time period that had more hatred towards transgender people, the 1920s. I’ve seen people give hate towards it without having seen it. Though admittedly I’ve only been able to view this movie in small clips and read the synopsis, myself, it seems far more rooted in reality than (Re)Assignment, and I feel like I could actually give it a fair watch.
- Who is/****w**hat is the mindset of the person who wrote the script?** Someone who understands the transgender community and what we go through will be able to write a realistic and respectful plot and character.
- What does the actor/actress feel about the transgender community? It didn’t help (Re)Assignment’s backlash when Michelle Rodriguez, the star of the film, basically told the trans community to shut up because, “she’s one of us because she’s bisexual,” showing how ignorant she was towards what being transgender is.
After asking those questions, consider the answers as to where to direct your anger. If hypothetically, you have known ally Lady Gaga portraying a trans man trying to live his life, despite society’s cruelty towards him, with a well-written script that shows the young man overcoming the challenge of being transgender to realize his dreams, why would you get angry? However, if an actor expresses that he was not very educated on the transgender community and sincerely apologizes after he realizes his character was poorly written and paints trans people in a negative light, maybe you should be angry at the director and writer, but understanding that, with the lack of education about transgender people, the actor may not have known what he was doing. (This should be done especially if the actor tries to better his understanding and becomes an active ally in for the transgender community after the movie.) But then of course, if you get a situation similar to Michelle Rodriguez in (Re) Assignment, with no apologies and sheer nasty comments from people involved, if any at all, then it’s okay and completely justified to get upset at all involved. It’s even more so justified if transgender actors were overlooked just because of their identity.
Bottom line though, no matter the outcome, no matter the actor/actress, no matter the writer, no matter the director, no matter the plot, getting upset at someone for their identity alone and feeling that it should dictate their roles is counter-productive and hypocritical. Instead of getting enraged over who plays who, we should focus on educating the world and making sure that all releases portraying transgender characters are well-researched and respectful. Getting angry and demanding to section ourselves even more is getting us nowhere.