Trump: Climate Change Is Real, But It’s So Far Along, Why Bother Doing Anything?

Scott L/CC BY-SA 2.0/Flickr

The Trump administration has argued that there is no longer any point in trying to reduce carbon emissions.

The Trump administration admitted in an environmental impact statement last month that the planet is warming to an alarming degree, but rather than use the conclusion to support carbon-reducing measures, the administration essentially argued there is no longer any point in trying.

From The Washington Post:

Last month, deep in a 500-page environmental impact statement, the Trump administration made a startling assumption: On its current course, the planet will warm a disastrous seven degrees by the end of this century.

A rise of seven degrees Fahrenheit, or about four degrees Celsius, compared with preindustrial levels would be catastrophic, according to scientists. Many coral reefs would dissolve in increasingly acidic oceans. Parts of Manhattan and Miami would be underwater without costly coastal defenses. Extreme heat waves would routinely smother large parts of the globe.

Yet this dire prediction was not employed to justify policy that would curb carbon output; it was floated as reason to forego greenhouse gas emission reductions, arguing that the world’s fate is already sealed.

The draft statement, issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), was written to justify President Trump’s decision to freeze federal fuel-efficiency standards for cars and light trucks built after 2020. While the proposal would increase greenhouse gas emissions, the impact statement says, that policy would add just a very small drop to a very big, hot bucket.

“The amazing thing they’re saying is human activities are going to lead to this rise of carbon dioxide that is disastrous for the environment and society. And then they’re saying they’re not going to do anything about it,” said Michael MacCracken, who served as a senior scientist at the U.S. Global Change Research Program from 1993 to 2002.

In order to avoid the drastic warming it predicts, the analysis says it “would require substantial increases in technology innovation and adoption compared to today’s levels and would require the economy and the vehicle fleet to move away from the use of fossil fuels, which is not currently technologically feasible or economically feasible.”

The White House did not respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Click here to read the full report.

Comments