BobArmstrong

It is the Dems who are determinedly anti-reality from their anti-science demonisation of the molecule which is the source of carbon to the biosphere and thus visibly greening the planet but by very basic undergraduate testable quantitative physic has essentially no effect on our temperature to their rejection of the binary , not n-of-your-choice nature of the DNA DOUBLE helix .
It is the Dems who are the "useful idiots" and determined to keep the population that way .

Comments (21)
No. 1-21
Yossarian Johnson
Yossarian Johnson

Editor

Hi Bob, are you accusing Democrats of being ‘anti-molecule’ and ‘anti-DNA’? Is this a new wedge issue for the Right?

BobArmstrong
BobArmstrong

It is the Dems and the global statists which created and foist the thoroughly debunked both observationally and theoretically AlGoreWarming demonisation of CO2 , the molecule which married in in equal molar measure with H2O even you are made from because every bite of food you eat is .

It is the Dems who try to reject the binary nature of sex one of the most ubiquitous structures of all of biology .

The Repubs and Libertarians don't reject solid STEM ; we reject the rejection of reality foisted in so much of academia outside those disciplines .

JohnZambis
JohnZambis

Editor

1) This is simply false. 97% of published climate science experts assert climate change is occurring.

2) It seems like you’re confusing biological sex and gender. These are two different things.

3) CO^2 is eaten by plants and humans exhale CO^2. This doesn’t mean that releasing great quantities of carbon into the atmosphere is harmless, it isn’t. It’s a direct cause of global warming.

BobArmstrong
BobArmstrong

Intellectualist ?!

durak_zheni
durak_zheni

C'mon Bob, you've shown yourself to be an ignorant conspiracy theorist. You understand so little. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is your friend! Read his books!

BobArmstrong
BobArmstrong

I'm sorry . The level of determined ignorance here is beyond redemption . You must know it yourselves .

BobArmstrong
BobArmstrong

It's mainly called knowing basic physics , chem and earth history together with math .

stdojo
stdojo

Wow. The intellectual laziness, abject stupidity and sheer arrogance exhibited by Bob Armstrong & his like is just mind numbing.

BobArmstrong
BobArmstrong

I deal in equations , not personalities . Is the experimentally testable computation at http://cosy.com/Science/warm.html#EqTempEq correct or not ? If not , what is the correct computation ? Do any of you even know how to calculate the temperature of a billiard ball under a sun lamp ?
I won't bother to repeat the common quotes from Einstein and Feynman about experiment trumping all consensus or titles .

Tyguy
Tyguy

So... hi Bob, I'm curious more at the fact that you are babbling like a dementia patient... All jokes aside, your logic is beyond flawed. You're citing articles and links that aren't even to legitimate or fact based/checked websites and calling them facts. If I don't see sources, I don't buy the information given. General rule of thumb. Not to mention... It's not all that credible... Of course you're going to prove yourself right 😂😂😂

Tyguy
Tyguy
JohnZambis
JohnZambis

Editor

\

Canadianvet
Canadianvet

Oh, wow, big words. I thought only your Trumpty Dumpty had the best words. Wait till he finds out that Bob Armstrongovich has bigly words too. Supercalifragilistic-expealadocious, right Bob ?

ZzZzZ
ZzZzZ

given the vocabulary you're using and how you're using it, it seems you're as related to science as your average TV-evangelist-preacher.

Andacar
Andacar

You guys appear to have a genuine internet crank in this "discussion." All the symptoms are there: the incomprehensible pseudo intellectual babbling, the self righteous sneering at this "world of fools," the all consuming desire to argue incessantly about the same narrow thing.

Ever hear of "Time Cube" guy? This is the same.

zip19709
zip19709

The equation for heating of a billiard ball under any type of light is irrelevant unless the billiard ball has an atmosphere of its own. CO2 is virtually transparent to shorter wavelengths of light (visible and up). It is translucent to longer wavelengths (infrared). Sunlight comes through the atmosphere, hits the ground and heats the surface which then radiates longer wavelength light which is reflected back to the surface by CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (e.g., methane). This is the physics of global warming. I hope you enjoy heating billiard balls with your heat lamp but please stop expounding your nonsense about global warming. It's one thing to know equations but a completely different thing to know which ones apply when and that's the skill that you seem to have not acquired. But, thanks for playing.

Debora Taylor
Debora Taylor

SAMM Tittle/??? 2020 will be first woman President....sorry Hillary.

Jimbest162
Jimbest162

Bob’s a nitwit...


U.S. & Global News

FEATURED
COMMUNITY