In 1968, Nixon Betrayed The U.S. By Undermining Vietnam Peace Negotiations

President Richard Nixon speak to Secretary of State Henry KissingerImage courtesy of the Central Intelligence Agency / Public Domain

Evidence shows that President Richard Nixon colluded with the South Vietnamese for the purpose of winning in 1968.

Evidence shows that President Richard Nixon colluded with the South Vietnamese for the purpose of winning the 1968 election over his Democratic opponent Hubert Humphrey. By doing so, Nixon betrayed the United States for his own personal electoral ambitions.

At the time, President Lyndon B. Johnson was negotiating a peace settlement with the North Vietnamese and Nixon sought to throw a "monkey wrench" in the process.

Through a trusted intermediary, Nixon contacted the South Vietnamese and promised them a better deal if they refused to continue their negotiations with Johnson.

In 1968, 30,000 Americans had already died in America’s war in Vietnam.

The South Vietnamese, believing Nixon would give them a better deal, chose to no longer cooperate in American peace negotiations, damning the entire process.

Nearly 60,000 Americans were killed in Vietnam by the time the U.S. fled in 1975.

Following his resignation in 1974, Nixon denied having ever harmed peace talks between the Johnson Administration and North Vietnam, however, evidence discovered since Nixon’s death shows this claim was a sham.

According to the New York Times:

Now we know Nixon lied. A newfound cache of notes left by H. R. Haldeman, his closest aide, shows that Nixon directed his campaign’s efforts to scuttle the peace talks, which he feared could give his opponent, Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey, an edge in the 1968 election. On Oct. 22, 1968*, he ordered Haldeman to “monkey wrench” the initiative.

Haldeman’s notes return us to the dark side. Amid the reappraisals, we must now weigh apparently criminal behavior that, given the human lives at stake and the decade of carnage that followed in Southeast Asia, may be more reprehensible than anything Nixon did in Watergate.”

In a conversation with the Republican Senator Everett Dirksen, the minority leader, Johnson lashed out at Nixon. “I’m reading their hand, Everett,” Johnson told his old friend. “This is treason.”

“I know,” Dirksen said mournfully.

Johnson’s closest aides urged him to unmask Nixon’s actions. But on a Nov. 4 conference call, they concluded that they could not go public because, among other factors, they lacked the “absolute proof,” as Defense Secretary Clark Clifford put it, of Nixon’s direct involvement.”*

Comments