If Not For Disastrous GOP Policies Since 2001, The US Would Be Running A Surplus

Screengrab/Washington Post/YouTube


The U.S. currently would have a surplus of $156 billion if not for a handful of Republican policies.

The federal government would be running a surplus today rather than posting billion dollar deficits were it not for four key Republican policies, according to Democrats on the U.S. Senate Committee on the Budget.

A report released on Monday reveals that America would be enjoying a $156 billion surplus:

Without the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the enormous post-9/11 defense buildup and two rounds of costly, regressive tax cuts, the federal government would be running a $156 billion surplus instead of a $779 billion deficit. The Trump Tax Cuts – which coupled permanent corporate tax cuts with temporary individual tax cuts – added $164 billion to the 2018 deficit.

President George W. Bush’s tax cuts added $488 billion to the deficit in FY 2018, according to the report, while President Donald Trump’s tax cuts contributed $164 billion.

Further, “the direct costs of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ran up $127 billion and base defense increases led to $156 billion in spending.”

What could nearly $1 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations and increased military spending have covered instead?

●Very nearly eliminate poverty for all Americans of any age. Estimated cost: $174 billion.

●Pay the one-year average of the 10-year infrastructure funding gap. Estimated cost: $144 billion.

●Provide high-quality early care and education (ECE) for children from birth to kindergarten. Estimated cost: $140 billion.

●Eliminate child poverty by simply boosting the income of all families with children (and children who do not live with their families) over the poverty line. Estimated cost: $69 billion.

●Double the budget of the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Geologic Survey. Estimated cost: $61 billion.

●Make public colleges and universities tuition-free for working families, cut student loan interest rates in half, and allow every American with student debt to refinance at the lowest interest rate possible. Estimated cost: $60 billion.

●Double the $1.40 per-meal allowance in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Estimated cost: $70 billion.

●End homelessness in America. Estimated cost: $22.5 billion.

Read the full report here.

Comments (4)
No. 1-4

Oh my God!!! This writer wants every American to suffer through a massive depression with it's associated rise in crime and suicides. A surplus in the US, where imports are larger than our exports demands that the government run a deficit!!!! Every hear the saying, one person's spending in another person's income? It is also true at the macro level of economics. When the government spends that is our income. Now if we exported more than we imported, then foreign spending would also be our income, but that is NOT the case. The only source of the American people's net income is from what the government spends. The deficit therefore, based on simple math is our savings.

The government spends $10, taxes back $9. Someone has that $1. That is public saving.


Boy are you confused!

DC Homeboy
DC Homeboy

What gibberish.


FYI, don’t confuse Trade deficits with spending deficits. Trade deficits do not affect spending deficits. Spending deficits arise when government spends more for services than they receive in taxes. Trade deficits arise when US companies (mostly) import more goods and services than they export. For the vast majority of goods and services the government is neither the importer nor exporter (eg. US steel companies buy steel from foreign manufacturers and US car companies sell cars to foreign buyers - government not involved).

U.S. & Global News