Here's How Joe Biden Plans to Tackle the Social Security Problem


Joe Biden has plans to reform Social Security in America.

Joe Biden has plans to reform Social Security in America, according to CNBC.

In 2020 alone, about 65 million Americans will receive more than $1 trillion in benefits through Social Security, disability, and survivor benefits. The funding for Social Security was expected to run out by 2035, according to the Social Security Administration. However, issues from the coronavirus pandemic could cause an even quicker depletion. Now, the program's fund could run out as early as 2028.

Presidential candidate Joe Biden has voiced his support for expanding the program, through higher taxes on wealthy Americans. Currently, employees and employers each pay 6.2 percent to the program from wages. That amount is capped at wages of $137, 700, but Biden wants it to apply to earnings over $400,000.

Biden's plan would result in the following:

  • Increased payments for individuals who have received retirement benefits for more than 20 years.
  • A minimum benefit for workers who put in more than 30 years of work guaranteeing them a benefit of at least 125 percent of the poverty level.
  • A 20 percent increase in survivor benefits for widows and widowers.
  • Allow teachers not eligible for Social Security to begin receiving pension benefits 10 years earlier than their plans require.
  • Eliminate benefit cuts for workers who are eligible for Social Security and a separate pension plan.

Social Security Works, an advocacy organization that seeks to expand the program, is backing Biden for president.

View the Full Story.

Comments (1)
No. 1-1

With both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris considered to be moderate candidates by the Democratic party establishment, their election will almost certainly translate into a governance with thinly veiled yet firm ties to corporate interests and little or no genuine intention of adequately improving the poor person’s lot in life.
To me, American (and Canadian) elected heads of state are mostly symbolic leaders, second to the greatest power-entrenched big money interests.
It may be reflective of why those powerful interests generally resist proportional representation electoral systems of governance, the latter which tends to dilute the lobbyist influence of the former.

Economics, Finance and Investing