its not a bill of needs, its a bill of RIGHTS.....why do you NEED a 60 inch plasma TV? cant you watch the same program on a 12 inch black and white?
Why do you need 30 round magazines??? Don't 5 shots get the job done four times over?
LMAO.......the peoples republic of commiefornia has some of the most oppressive anti-2A laws in the country. 30 round magazines are banned altogether.
That being said, it is still legal to possess handguns in CA. Go figure!
if you say its not a real thing, then you are either blind or lying. Diane Fienstien herself explicitly said when the ku klux klinton rifle ban passed "If I could make mr and Mrs america turn them all in tomorrow, I would" The democrats,, especially, are guilty of an all out assault on the second amendment since the passage of the firstg unconstitutional infringement on the second amendment, the National firearms act of 1934. Serveral legislators, including fienstien, have introduced bills that would make many of my firearms illegal. The state of California has confiscated people's guns because laws passed to make them "illegal". Add that to the proposed Magazine bans introduced by, guess who...the democrats, are a major infringement on the second amendment.
@bitter-clinger - When has anyone EVER explicitly stated that they wanted to come take your gun? Genuinely curious... As a leftist, I can say that's not a real thing.
If the motivation was political, then yes, this qualifies as domestic terrorism. With these lone gunmen, however, I think we also need to wait to see if mental health issues might have played a part (i.e. a la Sandy Hook and Aurora shootings). If so, then I would lean more toward calling this a random act of violence than a terrorist attack, but in any case, right now I don't think we know enough about the motive, planning, etc. that went into the shooting to make the call.
and of course, the gun grabbers are out in force.........smh
Dave Rubin tweeted "Will wait for more info but the motivation seems political so this should be viewed as domestic terrorism." Yep.
Who isn't a terrorist in the comments section of Breitbart though??
I was about to say, he is called a terrorist in the comments section of breitbart for sure
Maybe because he's a Bernie Sanders supporter?