How can you simultaneously claim to want a romantic partner based on values, be a Christian, yet simultaneously be okay with having a Muslim partner of "some denomination of Islam." All of Islam runs counter to Western and Christian cultures, to a greater or lesser extent. The entire religion was created entirely to kill Christians and Jews. That was its stated purpose. And yet someone who wouldn't want to drop that religion or convert to Christianity has your values, but a Buddhist does not? Has your pathological need to be seen as nuanced gone to your head?
To add an additional though or two: The two religions are grossly incompatible with one other, the case being that Islam is founded in the ways of the Old Testament and Sharia as by Muhammad’s teachings within the Hadith—which practices inequality between genders (i.e., females are always subordinate to males) and intolerance among opposing political ideologies (i.e., the Anglo-Saxon’s societal achievements in natural rights, common law, and the status quo cannot exist within the chaotic barbarism of Sharia)—while Christianity is founded by the New Covenant.
More to the point, Islam (among other flavored religions) considers Christians to be heretics in their worshiping of God (idolatry), worshiping of multiple Gods (polytheism), and humanizing of God (incarnation.)
The Quran, which is the core of Islam—regardless if referred to as “radical Islam” or not—views Christians as mere infidels (the unfaithful) or kafirs (nonbelievers) and wages damning war, pain and suffering against them all throughout; to quote (one of scores of such) passages from the Quran at 3:151: “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.”
The basic political structure of Islamists (e.g., Muslims) is essentially a tribal monarchy, again this is neither compatible with Christian values nor Western ideologies, such as separation of church and state, constitutional republicanism, individualism, etc.
Islam is a deeply flawed and archaic theology, period. It is not a religion of peace, but of insufferable death.
Islam is to religion as Keynesianism is to market economies and Trotskyism is to nation states.
@Cruciata_Nova The point of being a Christian is forgiveness of sins through Christ. Similarly, the point of Islam is submission to God. Knowledge of the history of these religions says nothing about their philosophical and theological underpinnings. Additionally, whites don't vote in favor of conservative policies. Whites in Europe are overwhelmingly liberal, and only just over half of whites vote conservatively in the US. The idea that white = conservative is just not backed up by reality. Sorry bud.
Considering this, it is self-evident that the way to maintain Western civilization is to repromote and propagate these values in the ethnicity likely to value them, as well ensuring as the demographic majority of that ethnicity. That is in YOUR best interest, yet every single thing you just said deliberately obstructs that goal. This means, fundamentally, that your actions oppose your stated Western principles. Without Western civilization, these will no longer exist. This is the reality of the situation, and yet you maintain your moral and intellectual superiority. Your condescension and deliberate denial will serve you well in a non-Western future, no doubt.
Oh, I don't understand these religions, do I? Somehow, in all my years of Bible Studies, I have never come across this completely obscure, novel piece of information. Thank you, oh wise one. I guess the fact that the entire religion of Islam being founded as entirely a military and political ideology, hell-bent on destroying all of Christianity and Islam, a tradition they've maintained for over 1500 years, lends itself quite well to compatibility with the West. Additionally, you might want to actually look into, well, reality, for once. It is provably the case that the whites, even in their completely corrupt shells of their former selves, are still the only ethnicity to vote in favor of conservative politics, i.e. small government, liberty, etc.. You deliberately ignore and obfuscate this fact, and it's pathetic.
You don't understand Islam or Christianity. Both teach worship of the Abrahamic God, that's what's important to me. Buddhism does not teach this. Your interpretation of the white race being central to Western culture and values is laughable when you consider that the leftist philosophies currently destroying the West were created by (and are being propagated by) guess what, WHITES.
More to the point, do you have any principles you actually care for? You claim to care about Western civilization, yet the fact that only whites on AVERAGE support it does not make it imperativefor you to support any means necessary of preserving a white supermajority?
You do realize you are thereby literally ending all the freedoms you claim to want for your children and their children, right?
Of course, intellectual honesty and critical thinking isn't your forte, so feel free to instead just ignore this question or accuse me of being emotional or radical, or deny the stats and the reality of the stats with "It's about ideas," "not all," etc.