Please Help Me To 1,000,000 Sub :
American Patriot :
SUB TO BACKUP CHANNEL HERE :
Linda Sarsour Attacks Pelosi ForChastizingIlhan Omar, ‘Doing Dirty Work Of White Men”
I wrote yesterday how Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, and Omar were falling in behind Barbara Lee who said we should not have retaliated after the 9/11 attacks that killed almost 3,000 Americans. Lee is a Marxist and now those such as Ocasio-Cortez are leading the party into the radical weeds where Lee lives. While that was going on, the Democratic Party started making noises about censoring Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for anti-Semitic comments. She’s made them three times since being elected. But the Democrats have backed off that for now, or at least, watered it down. Longtime Members of Congress and more moderate Democrats want Omar punished. Younger Democrats and progressives seem to have no problem with Omar’s “criticisms” and the party’s slide into full-blown anti-Semitism. Right on cue, here comes Women’s March leader Linda Sarsour to attack Nancy Pelosi for chastizing Omar. Sarsour is herself a raging anti-Semite of the first order. She has strong ties to Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan, who also has a burning hatred for those of the Jewish faith. Sarsour contends that the fury over Omar’s anti-Israel remarks stems from Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “white feminism” and her lack of experience with “intersectionality,” as well as moderate Democrats’ apparent hatred of racial minorities. Bull feces. Sarsour took to Facebook which oddly enough has never banned her:
“Nancy is a typical white feminist upholding the patriarchy doing the dirty work of powerful white men. God forbid the men are upset – no worries, Nancy to the rescue to stroke their egos,” Sarsour wrote, ripping into the longtime Democratic leader and current Speaker of the House. “For years, when members of Congress have spewed blatant anti-Muslim racism, Islamophobia, propaganda against Muslims and even held racist hearings with our taxpayer dollars, Democratic leadership were never swift to condemn said members or put out resolutions condemning Islamophobia and/or standing in solidarity with Muslims on the record in Congress,” Sarsour continued, angrily. “Democrats are playing into the hands of the right. Dividing our base and reinforcing their narrative and giving them an easier path towards 2020.” “You want a resolution? Condemn all forms of bigotry. All forms of bigotry are unacceptable. We won’t let them pin us up against each other. We stand with Representative Ilhan Omar. Our top priority is the safety of our sister and her family,” Sarsour concluded, tagging her “sister” Omar so that the post also appeared on Omar’s page.”
That resolution sounds eerily like the one the Women’s March actually issued after they were credibly accused of anti-Semitism. Go figure. More from The Daily Wire: “After a series of exposes revealed that both Sarsour and fellow Women’s March leaders Carmen Perez and Tamika Mallory had close ties to the Nation of Islam, had hired the Nation of Islam to do security work for Women’s March events, and had made openly anti-Semitic remarks to Jewish women involved in early Women’s March meetings, Sarsour and the organization “apologized” by issuing a blanket condemnation of “bigotry,” rather than condemning the specific bigotry — anti-Semitism — with which they were confronted. “Sarsour has continued to serve at the head of the Women’s March, and Mallory, who has the closest ties to the Nation of Islam, subsequently defended Louis Farrakhan in several interviews. “Perhaps the strangest part of Sarsour’s missive is that she blames Nancy Pelosi directly for the problems Omar is encountering. Pelosi is arguably the most successful and powerful female Democrat in history, and whether you agree with her or not, is a paragon of female achievement. “But she’s not nearly woke enough for Linda Sarsour, because she won’t openly embrace anti-Semitism.”
Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Community Guidelines Disclaimer: The points of view and purpose of this video is not to bully or harass anybody, but rather share that opinion and thoughts with other like-minded individuals curious about the subject.
Was originally published at: