Don’t Tread on Me, But Let Me Tread All Over You: The Credo of Personal Freedom

Steven Singer is a husband, father, teacher and education advocate.

Every neighborhood has one.

A yellow flag showing a coiled spring of a snake above the motto, “Don’t Tread on Me.”

In my usually well-manicured suburb, you’ll find it waving bravely over the garbage house.

There’s three broken down RVs sitting on the lawn, a busted sofa in the back yard, a rotten picnic bench and several rusted out vehicles in various states of disrepair.

I’m not sure why the owners think anyone would want to tread on them. We’d much rather walk quickly on by without being seen or commented on.

Because in my experience that’s the thing about most of the people who fly this flag.

They’re indignant about anyone stepping on their rights but all too ready to step all over yours.

I remember it wasn’t really too long ago that this flag had no such connotations.

It was simply the Gadsen flag, a relic of the American Revolution. It was nothing more than a reminder of a time when we cherished our national independence from Great Britain and wanted to make sure they knew we didn’t want the King to come back and start ordering us around.

In fact, it was designed by American general and politician Christopher Gadsden in 1775. This “Sam Adams of South Carolina” modeled his patriotic statement first used by the Continental Marines on an earlier famous cartoon from Benjamin Franklin’s Pennsylvania Gazette.

You’ve probably seen it. A snake is cut into several pieces – each representing one of the colonies – with the motto, “Join or Die.”

So originally it was a call for unity, perhaps even federalism. It was a way of framing the argument that we’d be stronger as one nation than as a group of separate states.

Gadsen’s version was really a continuation of that same thought. It was as if he were saying, “Here we are, one unified nation ready to strike to protect itself from tyranny.”

It wasn’t until 2009 that Gadsen’s flag became associated with the radical right.

Like so many hitherto nonpartisan symbols, it was appropriated by the Tea Party movement, which tried to cast their libertarian extremism as somehow harkening back to the American Revolution.

Even the name Tea Party is a misnomer. The original Boston members of the Sons of Liberty who threw British tea into the harbor in 1773 were protesting taxation without representation. Modern day Tea Partiers were protesting the taxes levied by their own duly elected representatives.

They were poor people duped into thinking the rich paid too much despite the fact of gross income inequality and the wealthy not paying their fair share.

It’s this willful ignorance that typifies the contemporary right.

The truth doesn’t matter. It only matters what can be spun into a pithy sound bite that can be broadcast on Fox News or some other propaganda source and then repeated ad infinitum in place of any real debate or conversation.

To be fair, the left does it, too, but not nearly to the same degree.

When a topic makes the rounds of the 24-hour news cycle, you can hear the same canned responses from right and left on just about every channel regardless of who is speaking. The only difference is that the left usually makes at least passing reference to reality while the right closes its eyes and says whatever it believes to be true with perfect conviction.

The Gadsen flag is a perfect example of this hypocrisy.

The motto “Don’t Tread on Me” has come to mean radical individual freedom.

I can do whatever I like and there’s nothing you can do about it.

I can own as many guns as I like. I can teach my kids whatever facts I like. I can discriminate against anyone I like.

But there’s never a mention about other people except to limit what they can do in relation to the speaker.

In short, there’s nothing explicit about making this rule universal – I won’t tread on you if you won’t tread on me.

It’s just don’t tread on me and I’ll do whatever I like in relation to you.

After all, many of these personal freedoms the radical right cherishes actually do impact the rest of us.

Unregulated gun ownership means more shootings, more suicides, more deadly instances of domestic violence, more kids coming to school with semi-automatic guns in their book bags and more malls and theaters slick with bystander blood.

Moreover, if you teach your kids whatever facts you like, that means you indoctrinate them into your worldview. You don’t give them the chance to see the real world for what it is in case they may have different views on it than you do. This impacts both your children and the country, itself, which will have to somehow run with a greater portion of ignorant and close-minded citizens.

And don’t get me started on discrimination! You think you should be able to say whatever you like to whomever you like whenever you like. It’s fine to wear a t-shirt calling Hillary Clinton a “cunt” but when late night comedian Samantha Bee does the same to Ivanka Trump, you’re up in arms!

You think you can support laws that allow bakers to refuse to make wedding cakes for gay couples but are raving mad when a restaurateur refuses service to Sarah Huckabee Sanders!

This kind of sanctimonious duplicity has real world consequences.

Unarmed black people are shot and killed by police at a much higher rate than white people. Yet you won’t tolerate any protest, condemnation or protest. People can’t assemble in the streets, athletes can’t kneel during the national anthem, you won’t even allow the slogan “Black Lives Matter,” because you say, “All Lives Matter,” while in reality you mean “All Lives Except Black Ones.”

You oppose abortion but no one is forcing anyone to have abortions. In your headlong crusade for individual freedom you want to ensure that others don’t have this choice because they might choose differently than you. Or at least they might choose differently than you SAY you do, because when the light of day is cast upon you, we find an alarming number of hypocrites here, too.

There are too many far right politicians who campaign on overturning Roe v. Wade who pressure their mistresses to abort the unwanted issue of their indiscretion.

The underlying cause of such myopia is a perverse focus only on the self.

You look at what you want for you and pay no attention at all to what others should likewise be allowed.

It is the underlying selfishness of post Enlightenment Western thought come back to haunt us.

Hobbes and Locke and Smith told us that greed was good.

It’s what makes the world go round.

You look to your self-interest, and I’ll look to mine, and that’s what’s best for everyone.

However, they forgot that everyone doesn’t have the same power – physical, social, financial or political. Some people are strong and some are weak. Some are rich and some are poor. If you pull the shortest straw at the lottery of birth, you won’t be able to get the same things for yourself as those who won it as soon as the doctor slapped their newborn bums.

So we have layers and layers of class and economics. We have social structures designed to keep black people here and Hispanics there and white people at the top. We have a society that worships the rich and bedevils the poor. We have belief systems that praise one kind of sexuality only and demonizes anything that diverges from that norm. And the most defining thing of any newborn baby is what you’ll find between its legs.

“Don’t Tread on Me” has become a farce.

It’s a maxim hoisted on those with very little individual power to convince them to join together and become powerful while guarding the door for the wealthy.

They sit atop their mountains of trash as if they were dragons on piles of gold.

And they point their pitchforks at the rest of us as if we wanted a piece of it.

In this way, they make themselves the willing patsies of the ruling class.

It’s a sad thing to behold.

Because if we all just stopped for a second and recognized our common humanity, we’d agree that the status quo is unacceptable.

If we were more concerned about the rights of all than just our own rights, we’d agree that the wealth of this great nation has not been fairly distributed.

The snake is coiled and ready to strike but it is pointed in the wrong direction.

It shouldn’t be pointed at 99% of us. And it shouldn’t be so solitary.

It should be a sea of snakes, a great slithering mass of humanity, hissing and spitting with venom, our reptilian eyes focused on the elites.

Don’t tread on me?

Don’t tread on USSSSSSSSSSS**!**

Was originally published at:

Comments (7)
No. 1-7


As an educator, I would have expected you to know that it is dangerous and asinine to generalize an entire group of people based upon your own experiences with 1 or 2 individuals. To say that every person, who holds the Gadsen Flag in high regard, is garbage because of the 1 person in your subdivision is childish at best. For every "garbage house with a Gadsen Flag" that you knew, I could point out a garbage house with a Hillary Clinton sign, or a Bernie Sanders sign, but that doesn't mean that every liberal or democrat is garbage... right? That would be like saying that every person who is on welfare and food stamps is cheating the government because I saw someone use their EBT card yesterday and then hop into their 2017 Escalade.

Maybe instead of vilifying those on the other side of the aisle, you should look at WHY they believe what they believe. You don't have to agree and take up their position, but what is wrong with respecting their viewpoints as legitimate to them?

For example, I'll use some of your own points in your article to give you an alternative view to what you hold in your presuppositions about Conservatives and Tea Party-ers.

Education: I assume that you are referring to people who chose to home-school their children (correct me if I am wrong). You claim people home-school their children so they can indoctrinate them in their own worldview, but I would counter your point that I wouldn't want my children being indoctrinated with your worldview. I have no problem with them being exposed to other worldviews, in fact, I think it helps them create their own view and then solidify their positions in it. I do not think it is appropriate in today's education system that educators are requiring adherence to their own personal views and opinions. (I.e. Abortion: While there are many hypocrites in all walks of life (as you pointed out a couple), those on the right stand up for those who can't stand up for themselves. They feel that a baby in his/her mother's womb has rights to life.

America is all about the rights and freedoms for everyone, as an individual and as a whole. It's codified in the Declaration of Independence... "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness". We differ in the beliefs of what "life" is sacred, what liberties are protected, and who can be happy.

Philip Carino
Philip Carino

Or perhaps they're just classic symbols we all accept as it is

Pat Greer
Pat Greer


United States was created on rugged individualism. This is a positive trait in our country. With that in mind it is almost comical to question how we've become such a self absorded self interested society. People rather make laws than act differently.

Steven Singer
Steven Singer


Jon, the Tea Party is a phenomenon of the right. There are corporate Democrats who are exceedingly selfish and don't care if their policies hurt others. However, they hide their selfishness under spin and doubletalk. Tea Party folks are unabashedly selfish. They don't care about anyone but themselves and are proud of it. That is their naked ideology. I'm not demonizing them so much as criticizing their unexamined assumptions. I have friends who believe this way but they wouldn't call themselves Tea Partiers. They say they're independents yet they vote Republican in every election and listen to talk radio constantly. They're actually very kind and caring with their immediate relations and people they have relationships with. It is only when it comes to the world around them that they fall back on this sick ideology.

Jon Saltzman
Jon Saltzman


I agree with your premise Steven that people often choose a position and don't care about the consequences to others. However, you've painted this as a problem of the Right and don't see that you too are doing the wrong thing by stereotyping the Tea Party folks. I'm willing to bet that you don't know any of them as friends so it's easy to vilify them.

Sam Jenkins
EditorSam Jenkins
New Comment
New Comment
New Comment
  • 1
Steven Singer
EditorSteven Singer
New Comment
New Comment
Pat Greer
EditorPat Greer
New Comment
New Comment