Brett Kavanaugh is the Link Between Rape and Abortion

Steven Singer is a husband, father, teacher and education advocate.

I think I will always associate Brett Kavanaugh with the taste of vomit in the back of my throat.

I couldn’t watch his sham of a confirmation hearing without my gag reflex going into overdrive.

Here was one of the most privileged of people on the planet alternatively weeping and raging that he was being denied his due.

Here was a man bemoaning that no matter what happened, his reputation forever would be ruined, but who likewise refused to call for an investigation to exonerate himself.

At least three separate women have accused him of sexual assault, yet Congressional Republicans are still planning to ram through his nomination to the Supreme Court – a lifetime appointment where he will almost certainly be the tie breaking vote to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

How fitting.

What perfect symmetry.

You couldn’t have planned it any more poetically.

A man accused of multiple attempted rapes who is doing everything in his power to make abortion illegal.

An overgrown frat boy crying into his beer that we can’t take away his God given right to take away women’s rights.

A confederacy of almost exclusively male lawmakers ready to discount women’s reports of violence so that they can limit women’s freedom to make decisions about their own bodies.

If there is one good thing to come from this farce, it is the spotlight it has shown on the relationship between rape and the movement to recriminalize abortion.

These two things are essentially intertwined.

On the one hand, we have sexual intercourse carried out under threat of violence, sex without consent or in direct violation of consent – a crime invariably perpetrated by men on women.

On the other hand, we have the removal of female consent from the birthing process.

They are almost the same thing, or at least two sides of the same coin.

In both cases, we’re removing or ignoring female permission, agreement, approval, agency. We’re saying it doesn’t matter what the woman wants. It only matters what men or a patriarchal society wants.

And the justification is an ancient text – the New Testament – that doesn’t mention abortion once. And the Old Testament actually gives instructions on how to conduct an abortion (Numbers 5:11-31).

Not that it really should matter. The United States is not a theocracy.

But it IS a patriarchy.

That’s what this is – an attempt by the most insecure, power hungry men to control women.

It is about keeping and strengthening a caste system where men are allowed to be fully realized people and women are allowed only secondary status.

It is about dehumanization clothed in piety and false morality.

All those people crying for the lost lives of a cluster of cells in female uteruses care not a wit about the thousands of women who will die from unsafe abortions once safe procedures become unlawful.

We’ve been here before. Abortion was illegal in the US from the early 1800s until 1973, and we know what will happen. There is actual history on this – back alley procedures conducted by quacks using sharp implements to pierce the womb – and there is no reason to think it won’t repeat itself.

Changing the law won’t stop abortions. It will just make them unsafe for everyone except rich women who can afford doctors willing to take a chance on going to jail for a big payday.

If these people really wanted to stop abortions, they’d support handing out free contraception. They’d turn every orphanage into a palace. They’d each adopt as many children as they could. They’d make neonatal care free, expand services to help women raise children, increase maternity leave, pay for free childcare, expand education funding.

But they don’t do any of that because despite their crocodile tears, their objection has nothing to do with unborn children.

It has to do with mature women making decisions for themselves. It has to do with conceptualizing them as people equal to men and with minds capable of consent.

It’s about allowing women the right to choose – choose whom to have sex with and what exactly the consequences of that sex will or will not be.

I am so thankful that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford came forward with her testimony. What bravery! What grace under pressure!

To be able to share with an entire nation her personal trauma at the hands of Kavanaugh. Such courage boggles the mind almost as much as those who refuse to accept her story as genuine.

They say that this is political. That it’s a hit job. Yet they pound their fists onto their ears to drown out Kavanaugh’s words in self-defense where he makes it entirely clear how partisan he is and will be once he takes the bench:

“This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election. Fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons. And millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.”

These are not the words of a fair arbitrator. They are the ravings of someone with an axe to grind.

But they do well to point out the elephant in the room – Donald Trump.

The man who nominated Kavanaugh has had at least 19 women accuse him of sexual assault. He even admitted to it on video in the infamous Access Hollywood tape.

Yet a minority of Americans elected him President through a legislative loophole kept open by centuries of neglect, apathy and moneyed interest.

I don’t know how this all will end. The FBI will conduct a limited investigation this week – probably stymied as much as possible by the Trump administration.

But the road that lead us here is achingly clear.

This is a tantrum of the patriarchy.

It is the weakest, most twisted men and their Stockholm syndrome suffering accomplices.

It is not about defining when life begins.

It’s about defining who gets to count as fully human – who gets the freedom to choose.

Was originally published at:

Comments (13)
No. 1-7
The Happy Hamster
The Happy Hamster

Re: Kavanaugh...let him have a "fair trial." It certainly feels like he is on trial already. If he is found guilty, then so be it...but as much as people may not like's not helping matters to demonize him. What does that accomplish? There already an FBI probe.

The Happy Hamster
The Happy Hamster

I agree that women should have the right and freedom to do what they wish to their bodies. However, I have to admit I am uncomfortable with the thought of women just having abortions on a whim.

Philip Carino
Philip Carino

Exactly my thoughts. Kavanaugh should have welcomed the FBI investigations right away to lessen the drama. If he's cleared then proceed with the confirmation no problem

Steven Singer
Steven Singer


Ted, you are over complicating this. It’s about human freedom - something people on the right claim to value so highly except when the humans in question are black, brown or female. Do women have the right to control their own bodies or not? Should their consent matter - whether it be about who to have sex with or what the consequences of that sex will be? I say it matters. Do you really want to take the opposite view? How do you think history will judge you for it?

Steven Singer
Steven Singer


Jon, stop and think a minute. This does not have to be left vs right. It’s just thinker vs mindless clones.

Kavanaugh says his reputation is ruined but doesn’t want an investigation to clear his name. Does that pass the smell test for you? Not for me. Look at all the witnesses that have come forward and are not being heard by Congress. I’m not saying he’s guilty. I’m saying he sure looks guilty. Let’s do a fair investigation to find out the truth. That seems a pretty reasonable goal no matter which side of the aisle you’re on.

Second, do I like that Dr Ford had to come forward and make her private pain a public spectacle? No. But I admire her for putting Country first. She is trying to save the entire nation from having an alleged sexual predator get a lifetime appointment to SCOTUS.

However, the main focus of my article is the connection between rape and anti-abortion activism. In both cases, it’s about ignoring female consent. I think that’s wrong. I think women should have control of their own bodies. That’s not a left or right position. It’s humanist vs slaveholder.

Ted The Bored Observer
Ted The Bored Observer


IMO this opinion is a clear example of Conflict Theory schema. There is an automatic cognitive concept of collective guilt between groups within this thread. Once that concept is triggered, then it automatically produces a pre-packaged response. In this case: straight, white, wealthy, privilege, etc. etc etc.

Now, it’s not to say that these cognitive concepts are never true. Brock Turner definitely triggers this concept and is 6 month punishment is endemic of white make privilege.

But in Kavanaugh’s case and the absence of 1) evidence 2) Feinstein holding this information I’m concerned that we jump to white, male, straight, privileged conclusion epithet without question.

My “white privilege” concept gets triggered a little bit in this situation, however, could it be something OTHER than white privilege? Am I projecting my dislike for the stereotypical alpha white male schema of every afternoon special or could there be something else. Or maybe it could be a mix.

One thing that concerns me is that Feinstein held this information since July. As a woman, I think if Feinstein truly was concerned for Dr. Ford, she would have taken her story more seriously. I think a appropriate thing to do was pull Kavanaugh to the side and bring up this allegation. And she DID have private conversations with Kavanaugh and did NOT bring this to his attention.

It’s my belief that the left is not above protecting at any cost their sacrament of abortion.

Even if Roe vs Wade was overturned (it won’t) then abortion would be decided not on a state by state basis. Places like New York and California will still have abortions available up until the fetus’s 18 birthday.

Jon Saltzman
Jon Saltzman


Steve, I don't even know where to begin here so let's start with the fact that you are viewing this matter. Also. Kavanaugh is somehow automatically guilty before proof or facts and who cares anyway because he is part of the Patriarchy and deserves punishment. Because even if he didn't do these crimes- he's guilty by association -right?

I notice that your concern for women doesn't extend to individual women. In Dr. Ford's case, she asked for anonymity and could have had it if Senator Feinstein not held on to this accusation and used it as a weapon against the process. It could have been fully vetted before the hearings. Hell, she interviewed Kavanaugh privately and said nothing about it. How did that help Dr. Ford?

You actually reveal your whole​ argument "It’s about defining who gets to count as fully human – who gets the freedom to choose."

Democrats care so much about abortion- which I argue is already settled law anyway, that they are willing to do anything to preserve it so I guess Ford and Kavanaugh have to be sacrificed for the "greater good."... And who cares about tearing the country apart? All must be sacrificed to the altar of abortion rights.

Sam Jenkins
EditorSam Jenkins
New Comment
New Comment
New Comment
  • 1
New Comment
Pat Greer
EditorPat Greer
New Comment
New Comment