The investigation was done before it started. No corroborating witnesses to support Dr. Ford's claim? Well of course not. When you don't interview the corroborating witnesses, you can tell us that there were no corroborating witnesses in the investigation. See how simple it is. Then the Senate ignores his ranting and raving in the questioning demonstrating in full view of the nation that he lacks the temperament for practically any job let alone that of an impartial judge, and thinks that he displayed a rational approach to bring to the bench. No partisanship at all, because he wrote an Op-ed saying that he was impartial in the Wall Street Journal. Well, that settles that. He says he's impartial despite all evidence to the contrary and that's good enough for the Republicans.Ok, if he was truly impartial, why would he need to write an Op-ed telling everybody he was...impartial? Maybe it was because he knows, and the White House knows that he demonstrated for the world that he's a biased partisan hack, to the extent that even former Justice Stevens said he's unfit for the gig.
Let's all wait till investigations are done