But we need plastics too. They’re crucial for our food packaging, creating a barrier against nasty bacteria and parasites, which is important during disasters. Physicians choose plastic for their gloves, sample vials, IV bags and thermometer covers because it helps prevent cross-contamination. And plastic often replaces metal on vehicle bodies to make them more fuel efficient and safer in accidents.
The physical features that make plastic useful also make it difficult to recycle and hard to replace in our manufacturing chain. And we dispose of plastics in unsustainable ways — 91 percent of the material isn’t recycled. To help reduce plastic waste, scientists and inventors are creating novel uses for plastics that would otherwise end up in the trash, or alternatives to the most wasteful plastic products we use today.
More than 27 million tons of polystyrene are manufactured every year. Our polystyrene takeout containers, plastic spoons and packing peanuts are commonly thrown away after a single use. But instead of heading to the trash, this plastic could have a useful second life, or could be avoided altogether, thanks to two innovative research projects under way now:
How to replace one of the most pervasive plastics
“The question was never really asked about what do we do with [plastics] after we’ve finished with them,” said John Williams, a chemist and business director of Aquapak, a biodegradable plastic manufacturer. For example, recycling plants can’t process paper coffee cups, which are lined with a thin layer of plastic for insulation and water resistance, causing an estimated 600 billion cups to be thrown away every year.
Williams said the plastic problem stems from our linear economies, wherein the material loses its value after use and is discarded at the end of its life cycle, instead of being repurposed.
Rather than tapping into oil resources to produce a steady stream of new and unnecessary plastic items, Williams said plastic products should be more purposefully produced and salvaged after use, even if it incurs additional costs to do so.
While this position seems to run contrary to capitalism, it is important to remember that plastic pollution comes with a social and environmental cost — to the tune of $139 billion a year, according to The Economist.
Damages to our health and the environment account for a third of this tab because of plastic-related pollution in air, water and land. So even though a shift to a sustainable economy — where more waste products are reused — might raise prices for manufacturers and consumers in the short-term, it could reduce environmental and health costs overall.
A bathtub full of packing peanuts made of polystyrene would only yield about three bowling balls worth of recyclable plastic.
So, Williams’ company spent 15 years developing a plastic alternative called Hydropol that can be more easily recycled than materials like polystyrene.
Hydropol can replace thin layers of non-recyclable plastics in products — like a plastic coating on an orange juice label — that would normally create impurities that make recycling more difficult. It is water soluble and can dissolve into harmless organic components. Hydropol can also be recycled with paper and plastic because of its unique cellulose structure.
While it sounds great, Yu Dong, a material scientist from Curtin University in Perth, Australia, noted that the basic material behind Hydropol still needs some tweaking.
Dong studies polyvinyl alcohol, the central component of Hydropol, and how it is used in packaging. While polyvinyl alcohol can biodegrade and easily blend with other materials, Dong said it comes with some notable setbacks.